This is a really important question our society needs to answer and I'd like to shed some light on it on a number of levels - personal, economic and long-term.Its called socialism. The problem being if everyone is given everything they need who is going to do all of the work needed to keep the country moving?...there has to be other ways to provide for everyone society. It’s just we can’t imagine it…
At a personal level, it's a myth that most people need to be forced to work. Most people, provided with the basic needs, still have plenty of things they want - better food, fancier tech, bigger house, better car, nicer vacations, more kitchen equipment, you name it. Whole economies thrive on just "wants" that are not needs, and people are willing to work for them. And there are plenty of intangible rewards, like respect, the chance to gain skill, and especially to rise in rank, that people are willing to work like crazy for even though they are not monetary. Studies have shown that most people who get more money don't stop working, they raise their sights. There is no shortage of workers.
It's true that at the current economic level, socialism alone is not an answer, but it doesn't need to be. The fact is that socialism - systematically providing for the needs of everyone in society - is only half of a system. Capitalism is the other half, the economic engine that organizes people into labor teams and distributes the outputs - goods, and money. Each is half of what we need; they can only work together.
The most successful countries - including ours! - have a "mixed" economy, with both capitalism and socialism. In places where it works better, they are closer to half and half. Right now we are leaning much too far in the direction of capitalism, so that socialism is a misunderstood and dirty word here. If we want to provide for everyone and still use market distribution, we could shift that balance right now. When people understand that capitalism and socialism only work together, then we can fully use both.
However capitalism itself is not a fair or great system, and there is an alternative that would be better. Capitalism does not refer to the free trade of goods. That's markets. Capitalism is the ownership structure - capital is the wealth of business which is owned by a very tiny number of people. We could have a different ownership structure, where the capital is owned by the people who do the work instead. It's called Syndicalism, where instead of being owned by capitalists, businesses are owned by "syndicates" of workers, who directly share in the decisions - AND the profits - of their own work. We could still utilize market economies and self-directed distribution, but workers would get a lot more of what they produce and wealth would be less concentrated.
But, in the long term, every year it takes less human effort to produce what's necessary to distribute goods and services, while our massive over-consumption is damaging the ecologies we depend on. We need to shift human life and human work away from producing "wants, not needs" and toward helping each other, and restoring our natural systems. In the future, AIs and robots can do the unpleasant labor while humans work to create and maintain a healthy environment to thrive in. We really will have no choice.