State Department provided 'clearly false' statements to derail requests for Clinton docs, 'shocked' federal judge says

Forum rules
Keep News and Politics about News and Politics.

Do not post full articles from other websites. Always link back to the source

Discuss things respectfully and take into account that each person has a different opinion.

Remember that this is a place for everyone to enjoy. Don’t try and run people off of the site. If you are upset with someone then utilize the foe feature.

Report when things come up.

Personal attacks are against guidelines however attacks need to be directed at a member on the forum for it to be against guidelines. Lying is not against guidelines, it’s hard for us to prove someone even did lie.

Once a topic is locked we consider the issue handled and no longer respond to new reports on the topic.
User avatar
Linaluo
Duchess
Duchess
Posts: 1425
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2018 1:09 pm

Unread post

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/state- ... judge-says

In a combative exchange at a hearing Friday in Washington, D.C., a federal judge unabashedly accused career State Department officials of lying and signing "clearly false" affidavits to derail a series of lawsuits seeking information about former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's private email server and her handling of the 2012 terrorist attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya.





U.S. District Court Judge Royce Lamberth said he was "shocked" and "dumbfounded" when he learned that FBI had granted immunity to former Clinton chief of staff Cheryl Mills during its investigation into the use of Clinton's server, according to a court transcript of his remarks.
"We were born free and we will stay free" -President Trump 2020
Billie.jeens
Princess Royal
Princess Royal
Posts: 6372
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2018 11:38 am

Unread post

“I had myself found that Cheryl Mills had committed perjury and lied under oath in a published opinion I had issued in a Judicial Watch case where I found her unworthy of belief, and I was quite shocked to find out she had been given immunity in — by the Justice Department in the Hillary Clinton email case,” he said Friday.

“So I did not know that until I read the IG report and learned that and that she had accompanied the Secretary to her interview.”

He didn’t know that because State Department officials never told him. Nor did they inform him at the time that Clinton had used a private email address on a personal server to handle department business. They also never let him know that when they searched for relevant documents to provide to Judicial Watch, they neglected to include Clinton’s emails.
“Modern journalism is all about deciding which facts the public shouldn’t know because they might reflect badly on Democrats."
Billie.jeens
Princess Royal
Princess Royal
Posts: 6372
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2018 11:38 am

Unread post

What concerns him the most is the State Department’s continue refusal to be upfront and honest with Lamberth.

“President Trump should ask why his State Department is still refusing to answer basic questions about the Clinton email scandal. Hillary Clinton’s and the State Department’s email cover up abused the FOIA, the courts, and the American people’s right to know,” he said in a statement.

He seemed to be insinuating that, despite President Donald Trump being in office, Obama-era officials — or what the judge described as “career State Department officials” — still remain embedded within the agency and are doing their very best to stop groups like Judicial Watch from uncovering the truth.

As noted by Judicial Watch, it was its own lawsuit against the State Department that “led directly to the disclosure of the Clinton email system in 2015.”

Yet even Trump’s Statement Department continues to stonewall, obfuscate and play what the judge termed “word games.”
“Modern journalism is all about deciding which facts the public shouldn’t know because they might reflect badly on Democrats."
Locked Previous topicNext topic