For this comparison to work, there has to be an attacked entity, and a terrorist group attacking it…
Who are you saying the terrorists would be in your situation?
For this comparison to work, there has to be an attacked entity, and a terrorist group attacking it…
Aletheia wrote: ↑Thu Oct 19, 2023 8:17 amYou don't see Democrat presidential hopefuls describing Nazi flag wavers as "very fine people".Momto2boys973 wrote: ↑Wed Oct 18, 2023 10:06 am That’s good. I hope that’s the end of that party.
But the question still remains, if you’re saying the 2023 Republican Party is a dozen white supremacists with Nazi flags, are then the hundreds and hundreds of pro Palestinian protesters holding Nazi flags, chanting “gas the Jews” and calling for Israel’s destruction the 2023 Democratic Party? If not, why?
It isn't so much what the extremists do, as how much the rest of the party condones their antics in order to court their vote.
That's not in the same ball park as praising Adolph Hitler.Momto2boys973 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 19, 2023 8:27 pm But I see democrat lawmakers having this same hateful attitude.
they’re demanding that the U.S stops standing behind Israel
Jeffries’s uncle, Leonard Jeffries, faced backlash in the 1990s for his comments accusing "rich Jews" of being responsible for the slave trade and alleging the existence of "a conspiracy, planned and plotted" by Jewish executives in Hollywood to portray black people poorly. Farrakhan is an infamous anti-Semite who has defended Adolf Hitler and assailed the "stranglehold that Jews have on this government."Aletheia wrote: ↑Fri Oct 20, 2023 2:34 amThat's not in the same ball park as praising Adolph Hitler.Momto2boys973 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 19, 2023 8:27 pm But I see democrat lawmakers having this same hateful attitude.
they’re demanding that the U.S stops standing behind Israel
There are Jews who don't think unquestioning support of Israel is a good idea.
SlimShady wrote: ↑Thu Oct 19, 2023 2:13 pmFor this comparison to work, there has to be an attacked entity, and a terrorist group attacking it…
Who are you saying the terrorists would be in your situation?
Did the good guy shoot a bystander by accident, or did he shoot through eight babies and an elderly handicapped woman, killing them all but making the decision that killing all those innocent people would be worth killing the “bad guy” ?SallyMae wrote: ↑Fri Oct 20, 2023 9:58 am
I don't see why it has to be terrorists. The attacker could be a terrorist, or a state actor, or an individual. For example, suppose a mass shooter opens fire at the mall and a brave "good guy with a gun" kills him, saving many lives. I'm sure you will agree that if the "good guy" accidentally kills an innocent bystander while taking out the shooter, that blood is on the shooter's hands, not our brave hero's - right?
Well, since October 7, Israeli forces have launched thousands of air bombardments in the Gaza Strip, killing at least 3,793 people, mostly civilians, including more than 1,500 children. The decision was made that killing all those innocent people IS worth "killing the bad guy," and many here would agree, *all* of that blood is on the hands of Hamas.SlimShady wrote: ↑Fri Oct 20, 2023 10:00 amDid the good guy shoot a bystander by accident, or did he shoot through eight babies and an elderly handicapped woman, killing them all but making the decision that killing all those innocent people would be worth killing the “bad guy” ?SallyMae wrote: ↑Fri Oct 20, 2023 9:58 am
I don't see why it has to be terrorists. The attacker could be a terrorist, or a state actor, or an individual. For example, suppose a mass shooter opens fire at the mall and a brave "good guy with a gun" kills him, saving many lives. I'm sure you will agree that if the "good guy" accidentally kills an innocent bystander while taking out the shooter, that blood is on the shooter's hands, not our brave hero's - right?
All decisions made would carry weight…
Since October 7th , Hamas has not stopped firing missiles for a single day at Israel… are they supposed to just wait to die without firing back?SallyMae wrote: ↑Fri Oct 20, 2023 10:38 amWell, since October 7, Israeli forces have launched thousands of air bombardments in the Gaza Strip, killing at least 3,793 people, mostly civilians, including more than 1,500 children. The decision was made that killing all those innocent people IS worth "killing the bad guy," and many here would agree, *all* of that blood is on the hands of Hamas.SlimShady wrote: ↑Fri Oct 20, 2023 10:00 amDid the good guy shoot a bystander by accident, or did he shoot through eight babies and an elderly handicapped woman, killing them all but making the decision that killing all those innocent people would be worth killing the “bad guy” ?SallyMae wrote: ↑Fri Oct 20, 2023 9:58 am
I don't see why it has to be terrorists. The attacker could be a terrorist, or a state actor, or an individual. For example, suppose a mass shooter opens fire at the mall and a brave "good guy with a gun" kills him, saving many lives. I'm sure you will agree that if the "good guy" accidentally kills an innocent bystander while taking out the shooter, that blood is on the shooter's hands, not our brave hero's - right?
All decisions made would carry weight…
Aletheia wrote: ↑Fri Oct 20, 2023 2:34 amThat's not in the same ball park as praising Adolph Hitler.Momto2boys973 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 19, 2023 8:27 pm But I see democrat lawmakers having this same hateful attitude.
they’re demanding that the U.S stops standing behind Israel
There are Jews who don't think unquestioning support of Israel is a good idea.
Aletheia wrote: ↑Fri Oct 20, 2023 2:34 amThat's not in the same ball park as praising Adolph Hitler.Momto2boys973 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 19, 2023 8:27 pm But I see democrat lawmakers having this same hateful attitude.
they’re demanding that the U.S stops standing behind Israel
There are Jews who don't think unquestioning support of Israel is a good idea.