The link I posted was about 1993 to 1999.mommy_jules wrote: ↑Sun Nov 27, 2022 6:33 pmCarpy posted a claim that you seemed to disagree with. I just posted links that backed up what she claimed. If you want to make claims about gun ownership in the 1950s, you are more than welcome to post a link, or data, or article to back up those claims. I’m not chasing them down. I’m not doubting that there has been a decrease in over 70 years. A lot has changed in that time frame.BobCobbMagob wrote: ↑Sun Nov 27, 2022 5:25 pmOk… now look up gun ownership rates in the 1950’s vs today.mommy_jules wrote: ↑Sun Nov 27, 2022 5:11 pm
“The National Shooting Sports Foundation® (NSSF®), the firearm industry trade association, revealed that at least 5.4 million people purchased a firearm for the first time in 2021. Nearly 30 percent of all firearm purchases last year went to new gun owners, based on NSSF’s retailer surveys and adjusted National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) background checks.“
https://www.nssf.org/articles/nssf-reta ... s-in-2021/
“Gallup has tracked both metrics of gun ownership annually since 2007, showing no clear increase or decrease in gun ownership over that time.”
https://news.gallup.com/poll/264932/per ... -guns.aspx
According to Gallup polls, in 1993 51% of homes had a gun in it,
By the time we get to 1999, that number is down to 34%.
https://news.gallup.com/poll/179213/six ... safer.aspx
What does this quote make you think? Agree or disagree?
Forum rules
Keep News and Politics about News and Politics.
Do not post full articles from other websites. Always link back to the source
Discuss things respectfully and take into account that each person has a different opinion.
Remember that this is a place for everyone to enjoy. Don’t try and run people off of the site. If you are upset with someone then utilize the foe feature.
Report when things come up.
Personal attacks are against guidelines however attacks need to be directed at a member on the forum for it to be against guidelines. Lying is not against guidelines, it’s hard for us to prove someone even did lie.
Once a topic is locked we consider the issue handled and no longer respond to new reports on the topic.
Keep News and Politics about News and Politics.
Do not post full articles from other websites. Always link back to the source
Discuss things respectfully and take into account that each person has a different opinion.
Remember that this is a place for everyone to enjoy. Don’t try and run people off of the site. If you are upset with someone then utilize the foe feature.
Report when things come up.
Personal attacks are against guidelines however attacks need to be directed at a member on the forum for it to be against guidelines. Lying is not against guidelines, it’s hard for us to prove someone even did lie.
Once a topic is locked we consider the issue handled and no longer respond to new reports on the topic.
-
- Regent
- Posts: 4182
- Joined: Mon May 21, 2018 5:26 am
A lot of my sales the last couple years have been new gun owners.BobCobbMagob wrote: ↑Sun Nov 27, 2022 6:42 pmThe link I posted was about 1993 to 1999.mommy_jules wrote: ↑Sun Nov 27, 2022 6:33 pmCarpy posted a claim that you seemed to disagree with. I just posted links that backed up what she claimed. If you want to make claims about gun ownership in the 1950s, you are more than welcome to post a link, or data, or article to back up those claims. I’m not chasing them down. I’m not doubting that there has been a decrease in over 70 years. A lot has changed in that time frame.BobCobbMagob wrote: ↑Sun Nov 27, 2022 5:25 pm
Ok… now look up gun ownership rates in the 1950’s vs today.
According to Gallup polls, in 1993 51% of homes had a gun in it,
By the time we get to 1999, that number is down to 34%.
https://news.gallup.com/poll/179213/six ... safer.aspx
- Baconqueen13
- Princess Royal
- Posts: 6256
- Joined: Mon May 21, 2018 12:10 am
- Location: In Sanity
Cause I said crayon eater? That's a military thing. No surprise that you don't understand the reference.
- mommy_jules
- Regent
- Posts: 3797
- Joined: Wed May 23, 2018 8:47 am
I’m aware. I read it.BobCobbMagob wrote: ↑Sun Nov 27, 2022 6:42 pmThe link I posted was about 1993 to 1999.mommy_jules wrote: ↑Sun Nov 27, 2022 6:33 pmCarpy posted a claim that you seemed to disagree with. I just posted links that backed up what she claimed. If you want to make claims about gun ownership in the 1950s, you are more than welcome to post a link, or data, or article to back up those claims. I’m not chasing them down. I’m not doubting that there has been a decrease in over 70 years. A lot has changed in that time frame.BobCobbMagob wrote: ↑Sun Nov 27, 2022 5:25 pm
Ok… now look up gun ownership rates in the 1950’s vs today.
According to Gallup polls, in 1993 51% of homes had a gun in it,
By the time we get to 1999, that number is down to 34%.
https://news.gallup.com/poll/179213/six ... safer.aspx
“Forty-two percent of Americans report having a gun in their home, similar to the average reported to Gallup over the past decade. This self-reported measure has fluctuated from survey to survey, but is consistent with trends since 2004. Longer term, Gallup has found that household gun ownership has ranged from a low of 34% in 1999 to a high of 51% in 1993.“
You also told me to look up gun ownership in the 1950s…so what I said still stands.
“Regardless of Americans' perceptions of crime and their need to protect themselves, violent crime rates fell significantly from 1993 to 2012. While it may be a contentious assertion, some attribute falling crime rates to increased gun sales.”
Also from your link…^^^
Ok, but that wouldn’t have anything to do with overall ownership going down either.Carpy wrote: ↑Sun Nov 27, 2022 6:45 pmA lot of my sales the last couple years have been new gun owners.BobCobbMagob wrote: ↑Sun Nov 27, 2022 6:42 pmThe link I posted was about 1993 to 1999.mommy_jules wrote: ↑Sun Nov 27, 2022 6:33 pm
Carpy posted a claim that you seemed to disagree with. I just posted links that backed up what she claimed. If you want to make claims about gun ownership in the 1950s, you are more than welcome to post a link, or data, or article to back up those claims. I’m not chasing them down. I’m not doubting that there has been a decrease in over 70 years. A lot has changed in that time frame.
There are going to be a lot of new owners, but if the new owners don’t amount to the same number of owners as before due to death or simply getting rid of their guns, overall ownership goes down.
-
- Regent
- Posts: 4182
- Joined: Mon May 21, 2018 5:26 am
Crayon eater isn't just a military thing, it's a common phrase. Like I said, grow up. You are only doubling down to prove my point.Baconqueen13 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 27, 2022 6:49 pmCause I said crayon eater? That's a military thing. No surprise that you don't understand the reference.
- Baconqueen13
- Princess Royal
- Posts: 6256
- Joined: Mon May 21, 2018 12:10 am
- Location: In Sanity
The quote was said by a guy in the USMC...aka.... a marine. The common reference between branches is that marines are crayon eaters. Pull the stick out ConspiracarpyCarpy wrote: ↑Sun Nov 27, 2022 7:30 pmCrayon eater isn't just a military thing, it's a common phrase. Like I said, grow up. You are only doubling down to prove my point.Baconqueen13 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 27, 2022 6:49 pmCause I said crayon eater? That's a military thing. No surprise that you don't understand the reference.
-
- Regent
- Posts: 4182
- Joined: Mon May 21, 2018 5:26 am
Damn, you are hellbent on proving my point.Baconqueen13 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 27, 2022 7:58 pmThe quote was said by a guy in the USMC...aka.... a marine. The common reference between branches is that marines are crayon eaters. Pull the stick out ConspiracarpyCarpy wrote: ↑Sun Nov 27, 2022 7:30 pmCrayon eater isn't just a military thing, it's a common phrase. Like I said, grow up. You are only doubling down to prove my point.Baconqueen13 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 27, 2022 6:49 pm
Cause I said crayon eater? That's a military thing. No surprise that you don't understand the reference.
- Della
- Princess
- Posts: 21080
- Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2018 12:46 pm
Oh just stop.Baconqueen13 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 27, 2022 7:58 pmThe quote was said by a guy in the USMC...aka.... a marine. The common reference between branches is that marines are crayon eaters. Pull the stick out ConspiracarpyCarpy wrote: ↑Sun Nov 27, 2022 7:30 pmCrayon eater isn't just a military thing, it's a common phrase. Like I said, grow up. You are only doubling down to prove my point.Baconqueen13 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 27, 2022 6:49 pm
Cause I said crayon eater? That's a military thing. No surprise that you don't understand the reference.
306/232
But I'm still the winner! They lied! They cheated! They stole the election!
But I'm still the winner! They lied! They cheated! They stole the election!
- Baconqueen13
- Princess Royal
- Posts: 6256
- Joined: Mon May 21, 2018 12:10 am
- Location: In Sanity
Why? Because you don't like it? Please try to understand I don't give a shit.Thelma Harper wrote: ↑Sun Nov 27, 2022 8:22 pmOh just stop.Baconqueen13 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 27, 2022 7:58 pmThe quote was said by a guy in the USMC...aka.... a marine. The common reference between branches is that marines are crayon eaters. Pull the stick out Conspiracarpy