Mar-a-Lago raided by FBI

[Quorra2.0]

Oh really? Have you seen the warrant that they haven’t made public yet? You must be a very important insider.

It’s been reported, even by CNN that the room was secured.



https://www.cnn.com/2022/08/09/politics ... index.html

You have to wonder how a magistrate in FL who recused himself from a case involving Trump and Hillary because he didn’t feel he could be unbiased towards Trump thought it was okay to sign a search warrant 6 weeks later. SMH



https://www.kulr8.com/news/national/flo ... ec67d.html

It really doesn’t matter whether they were sitting in boxes at on the 18th hole or locked in a vault within a vault within a room with high tech security. By law, he was not to take these documents. This isn’t some made up law that the Democrats pulled out of their asses. He’s just the only former president who hasn’t complied with this law. Which is only compounded by how many docs the Archives had to tape up because of his continual habit of violating presidential record keeping and transparency laws that were implemented shortly after Watergate.

ETA: not really over the judge. He had to recuse himself. Otherwise IF Trump won, it would have been easily appealed which could have swayed on the ruling in the appeal and possibly cost him his seat on the bench. A search warrant is a little different, there were no grounds for him to deny the warrant and he wouldn’t be the presiding judge over the case. Now if he had not signed the warrant with there being no grounds to deny the warrant, then it could have caused him to be removed from the bench.

Well said and I totally agree.

Thank you.

What do you think of the informant? I have suspicions it’s a family member. I just don’t think there is anyone he’d trust more who would know what he still had and where, and there’s something…idk. Not that it really matters, it’s more of a curiosity, a puzzle my mind is intrigued with.

[WellPreserved]

Garland will be speaking in about 5 minutes. May or may not be about warrant served.

[Della]

https://www.cnn.com/2022/08/11/politics ... index.html

[MonarchMom]

For over a year the Archivists requested the return of the documents, negotiated what and when they would be returned, and prior subpoenas were issued for the return of improperly removed White House documents. When they still did not get all the documents returned, the FBI used a search warrant to remove the remaining documents into Federal Custody.

If DT had not violated the law by removing the documents none of this would have been needed. If he had returned them at the original request none of this would have been needed.

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/08/11/us/p ... poena.html

[MonarchMom]

Interesting to see if DT's attorneys will ask the court to keep the warrant sealed.... His own choice to publicize the event is what makes it possible to now unseal the warrant and inventory list of what was removed.

[SouthernIslander]

It really doesn’t matter whether they were sitting in boxes at on the 18th hole or locked in a vault within a vault within a room with high tech security. By law, he was not to take these documents. This isn’t some made up law that the Democrats pulled out of their asses. He’s just the only former president who hasn’t complied with this law. Which is only compounded by how many docs the Archives had to tape up because of his continual habit of violating presidential record keeping and transparency laws that were implemented shortly after Watergate.

ETA: not really over the judge. He had to recuse himself. Otherwise IF Trump won, it would have been easily appealed which could have swayed on the ruling in the appeal and possibly cost him his seat on the bench. A search warrant is a little different, there were no grounds for him to deny the warrant and he wouldn’t be the presiding judge over the case. Now if he had not signed the warrant with there being no grounds to deny the warrant, then it could have caused him to be removed from the bench.

Well said and I totally agree.

Thank you.

What do you think of the informant? I have suspicions it’s a family member. I just don’t think there is anyone he’d trust more who would know what he still had and where, and there’s something…idk. Not that it really matters, it’s more of a curiosity, a puzzle my mind is intrigued with.

Trump is the type of person who has screwed over so many people and runs his mouth way too much. I wouldn't know where to start as far as guessing who threw him under the bus. LOL!!! Its no telling who it was.

[WellPreserved]

It really doesn’t matter whether they were sitting in boxes at on the 18th hole or locked in a vault within a vault within a room with high tech security. By law, he was not to take these documents. This isn’t some made up law that the Democrats pulled out of their asses. He’s just the only former president who hasn’t complied with this law. Which is only compounded by how many docs the Archives had to tape up because of his continual habit of violating presidential record keeping and transparency laws that were implemented shortly after Watergate.

ETA: not really over the judge. He had to recuse himself. Otherwise IF Trump won, it would have been easily appealed which could have swayed on the ruling in the appeal and possibly cost him his seat on the bench. A search warrant is a little different, there were no grounds for him to deny the warrant and he wouldn’t be the presiding judge over the case. Now if he had not signed the warrant with there being no grounds to deny the warrant, then it could have caused him to be removed from the bench.

Well said and I totally agree.

Thank you.

What do you think of the informant? I have suspicions it’s a family member. I just don’t think there is anyone he’d trust more who would know what he still had and where, and there’s something…idk. Not that it really matters, it’s more of a curiosity, a puzzle my mind is intrigued with.

I think it may have been a member of Secret Service.

[Deleted User 1990]

OoooooHhhhhhoooooo!!!

Boy had the info on Nukes in his files.

What was he going to do with that?!?

[Baconqueen13]

OoooooHhhhhhoooooo!!!

Boy had the info on Nukes in his files.

What was he going to do with that?!?

Sell it to the Saudi's who he just hosted them at his Bedminster golf course (same one he buried his ex wife at) on July 28th. My bet was he would sell us out to China but that was before he was elected the first time. Either way it's Treason. He belongs in jail.

[MonarchMom]

OoooooHhhhhhoooooo!!!

Boy had the info on Nukes in his files.

What was he going to do with that?!?

Sell it to the Saudi's who he just hosted them at his Bedminster golf course (same one he buried his ex wife at) on July 28th. My bet was he would sell us out to China but that was before he was elected the first time. Either way it's Treason. He belongs in jail.