Authorities in Georgia ruled Sunday that the fatal police shooting of Rayshard Brooks outside an Atlanta Wendy's was a homicide.
Brooks, 27, died after he was shot twice in the back on June 12, the Fulton County Medical Examiner's Office said in a statement. Brooks was shot last Friday night after a confrontation with two Atlanta police officers in the parking lot of the fast-food restaurant.
Rayshard Brooks Shooting classified as a Homicide by the medical examiner
Forum rules
Keep News and Politics about News and Politics.
Do not post full articles from other websites. Always link back to the source
Discuss things respectfully and take into account that each person has a different opinion.
Remember that this is a place for everyone to enjoy. Don’t try and run people off of the site. If you are upset with someone then utilize the foe feature.
Report when things come up.
Personal attacks are against guidelines however attacks need to be directed at a member on the forum for it to be against guidelines. Lying is not against guidelines, it’s hard for us to prove someone even did lie.
Once a topic is locked we consider the issue handled and no longer respond to new reports on the topic.
Keep News and Politics about News and Politics.
Do not post full articles from other websites. Always link back to the source
Discuss things respectfully and take into account that each person has a different opinion.
Remember that this is a place for everyone to enjoy. Don’t try and run people off of the site. If you are upset with someone then utilize the foe feature.
Report when things come up.
Personal attacks are against guidelines however attacks need to be directed at a member on the forum for it to be against guidelines. Lying is not against guidelines, it’s hard for us to prove someone even did lie.
Once a topic is locked we consider the issue handled and no longer respond to new reports on the topic.
-
- Countess
- Posts: 335
- Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2019 2:21 pm
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nbcnew ... cna1231042
-
- Donated
-
Princess
- Posts: 10028
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2020 9:52 pm
How could being shot in the back not be ruled homicide? The question is going to be whether or not it was justifiable. IMO, it obviously was not but there will be those who feel that it was justified. An unarmed suspect in a non-violent crime possibly escaping (of course house, keys, and ID was retained by police). We need to rethink our policing in the US and cases like this only make it more clear that our system is broken.
"The books that the world calls immoral are books that show its own shame." - Oscar Wilde
-
- Regent
- Posts: 2342
- Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2019 1:42 pm
Criminal. There was no reason for it. They had his car. His license. They knew who he was and where he lived. Sometimes you can just them go, you know? Literally no reason to try to escalate, their lives were in no danger. Catch himater when the situation was more defused.
When people talk about an entrenched police problem, this is textbook. Even with the protests, even with the documented brutality, even with body cams, even with cell phones recording everything nowadays, even with the world watching, they still escalated the situation. They still shot to kill. They have generally been safe until now, they've always gotten away with it, and they may again. They have to know that, down deep.
When people talk about an entrenched police problem, this is textbook. Even with the protests, even with the documented brutality, even with body cams, even with cell phones recording everything nowadays, even with the world watching, they still escalated the situation. They still shot to kill. They have generally been safe until now, they've always gotten away with it, and they may again. They have to know that, down deep.