How on earth is this crazy Orwellian narrative helpful to the public? "Flu shot f@#$% up. Get your flu shot."
https://stage.health.com/cold-flu-si...ns-flu-dangers
News media love to turn every tragedy into a blame game, a moral lesson, or both. But instead of, "Our vaccinated daughter died of the flu. Please don't assume the vaccine will protect your kids - hand-washing and staying home are important" . . . . we get:
Quote:
As time passed, Pugh and Splan decided to use Emma’s story to raise awareness about pediatric flu and to encourage everyone to get the flu shot.
.“A lot of people wonder why we’re recommending the flu shot even though it didn’t work for us. But every time you get in a car you still get a seat belt. Why not stack the deck in your favor
Actually, instead of the seatbelt, let's use another pro-compliance favorite, the car seat.
Quote:
"Healthy 6-Year-Old Dies When Graco Booster Fails in Accident."
Second, why does this article fail to inform the public that subsequent influenza vaccinations lessen effectiveness? A false sense of confidence from the Peltzman Effect could end up killing more children.Quote:
"A lot of people wonder why we're recommending Graco boosters even though it didn't work for us. But . . . why not stack the deck in your favor."
https://www.statnews.com/2015/11/11/flu ... ctiveness/
Also, whatever happened to the narrative that flu shots lessen flu symptoms?
Finally, why does the CDC keep lying through its teeth?
Quote:
According to the CDC, the best way to prevent flu is with a flu vaccine.
Um, I'm pretty sure that methods like hand-washing and voluntary quarantines are more than 19% effective.