Mom Confessions

DSamuels wrote: ↑Wed Jun 29, 2022 9:15 pm

Lemons wrote: ↑Wed Jun 29, 2022 9:06 pm

DSamuels wrote: ↑Wed Jun 29, 2022 8:06 pm

Hmm, maybe that’s because this post was centered and titled on the F***ing denial part, so I was sticking to the topic. I have not heard any SS testimony. For the most part I’ve been ignoring the hearings. I haven’t disputed that Trump was furious or shouting. What exactly do you think I am ignoring?

That’s the problem. Trump supporters are not watching but they jump on an issue that doesn’t take anything away from the hearings.

There are so many videos, text messages, emails and first hand testimony that verify what happened that day.

Instead of wondering if she’s lying, even though you didn’t watch her testimony, you should watch it.

Maybe if it was a bipartisan committee there might be some more interest.

DSamuels wrote: ↑Wed Jun 29, 2022 9:15 pm

Lemons wrote: ↑Wed Jun 29, 2022 9:06 pm

DSamuels wrote: ↑Wed Jun 29, 2022 8:06 pm

Hmm, maybe that’s because this post was centered and titled on the F***ing denial part, so I was sticking to the topic. I have not heard any SS testimony. For the most part I’ve been ignoring the hearings. I haven’t disputed that Trump was furious or shouting. What exactly do you think I am ignoring?

That’s the problem. Trump supporters are not watching but they jump on an issue that doesn’t take anything away from the hearings.

There are so many videos, text messages, emails and first hand testimony that verify what happened that day.

Instead of wondering if she’s lying, even though you didn’t watch her testimony, you should watch it.

Maybe if it was a bipartisan committee there might be some more interest.

Francee89 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 29, 2022 10:03 pm

DSamuels wrote: ↑Wed Jun 29, 2022 9:15 pm

Lemons wrote: ↑Wed Jun 29, 2022 9:06 pm

That’s the problem. Trump supporters are not watching but they jump on an issue that doesn’t take anything away from the hearings.

There are so many videos, text messages, emails and first hand testimony that verify what happened that day.

Instead of wondering if she’s lying, even though you didn’t watch her testimony, you should watch it.

Maybe if it was a bipartisan committee there might be some more interest.

It is bipartisan. Unless your definition of Republican is someone who displays total fealty to Trump, Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger are very much Republicans.

Not to mention, it was Senate Republicans that blocked an independent, 9/11 Commission style investigation, https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-57272756.amp followed by Kevin McCarthy removing every other Republican from the Committee. There doesn’t seem to be any evidence Republicans were interested in a a totally independent and bipartisan fact finding mission when that was voted down by Senate Republicans and by the House GOP, seemingly because such a thing would’ve upset Donald.

DSamuels wrote: ↑Wed Jun 29, 2022 9:15 pm

Lemons wrote: ↑Wed Jun 29, 2022 9:06 pm

DSamuels wrote: ↑Wed Jun 29, 2022 8:06 pm

Hmm, maybe that’s because this post was centered and titled on the F***ing denial part, so I was sticking to the topic. I have not heard any SS testimony. For the most part I’ve been ignoring the hearings. I haven’t disputed that Trump was furious or shouting. What exactly do you think I am ignoring?

That’s the problem. Trump supporters are not watching but they jump on an issue that doesn’t take anything away from the hearings.

There are so many videos, text messages, emails and first hand testimony that verify what happened that day.

Instead of wondering if she’s lying, even though you didn’t watch her testimony, you should watch it.

Maybe if it was a bipartisan committee there might be some more interest.

DSamuels wrote: ↑Wed Jun 29, 2022 10:35 pm

Francee89 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 29, 2022 10:03 pm

DSamuels wrote: ↑Wed Jun 29, 2022 9:15 pm

Maybe if it was a bipartisan committee there might be some more interest.

It is bipartisan. Unless your definition of Republican is someone who displays total fealty to Trump, Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger are very much Republicans.

Not to mention, it was Senate Republicans that blocked an independent, 9/11 Commission style investigation, https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-57272756.amp followed by Kevin McCarthy removing every other Republican from the Committee. There doesn’t seem to be any evidence Republicans were interested in a a totally independent and bipartisan fact finding mission when that was voted down by Senate Republicans and by the House GOP, seemingly because such a thing would’ve upset Donald.

Wow! You call it bipartisan because there are 2 whole republicans on it? Ones that voted for impeachment. LMAO!

There’s a really cute picture of Liz Cheney hugging Hutchison after the committee finished.

Francee89 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 29, 2022 11:11 pm

DSamuels wrote: ↑Wed Jun 29, 2022 10:35 pm

Francee89 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 29, 2022 10:03 pm

It is bipartisan. Unless your definition of Republican is someone who displays total fealty to Trump, Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger are very much Republicans.

Not to mention, it was Senate Republicans that blocked an independent, 9/11 Commission style investigation, https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-57272756.amp followed by Kevin McCarthy removing every other Republican from the Committee. There doesn’t seem to be any evidence Republicans were interested in a a totally independent and bipartisan fact finding mission when that was voted down by Senate Republicans and by the House GOP, seemingly because such a thing would’ve upset Donald.

Wow! You call it bipartisan because there are 2 whole republicans on it? Ones that voted for impeachment. LMAO!

There’s a really cute picture of Liz Cheney hugging Hutchison after the committee finished.

Lol, yes, it is (by definition) bipartisan when there are members of the two parties on serving it. And again, there could have been more Republicans on it, but Kevin McCarthy - who once claimed Trump bore responsibility for January 6th, but backtracked the moment Donald got mad at him - chose to remove them, after first opposing a much more independent commission. And we’re supposed to believe him, and the majority of other elected and non-elected Republicans, genuinely wanted or would’ve respected any sort of investigation at all? To borrow your phrasing - Wow, LMAO!

There’s lots of absolutely adorable pictures of Republicans who voted to block an independent commission investigating January 6th with Trump in months after January 2021 floating around.

DSamuels wrote: ↑Thu Jun 30, 2022 1:24 am

Francee89 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 29, 2022 11:11 pm

DSamuels wrote: ↑Wed Jun 29, 2022 10:35 pm

Wow! You call it bipartisan because there are 2 whole republicans on it? Ones that voted for impeachment. LMAO!

There’s a really cute picture of Liz Cheney hugging Hutchison after the committee finished.

Lol, yes, it is (by definition) bipartisan when there are members of the two parties on serving it. And again, there could have been more Republicans on it, but Kevin McCarthy - who once claimed Trump bore responsibility for January 6th, but backtracked the moment Donald got mad at him - chose to remove them, after first opposing a much more independent commission. And we’re supposed to believe him, and the majority of other elected and non-elected Republicans, genuinely wanted or would’ve respected any sort of investigation at all? To borrow your phrasing - Wow, LMAO!

There’s lots of absolutely adorable pictures of Republicans who voted to block an independent commission investigating January 6th with Trump in months after January 2021 floating around.

McCarthy removed his picks after Nancy refused to seat 2 of his 5. So it would have been 7 democrats, and 5 republicans 2 of which voted with the democrats for impeachment. Gee, sounds fair to me.

The only bipartisan part of the committee is the 2 republicans who hate Trump voting in lockstep with the democrats. It may loosely fit the definition, but it doesn’t pass the smell test.

I guess you would think 7 republicans plus Manchin and Sinema on a committee investigating a democrat to be completely bipartisan.

Thelma Harper wrote: ↑Wed Jun 29, 2022 7:34 pm

DSamuels wrote: ↑Wed Jun 29, 2022 7:12 pm

Thelma Harper wrote: ↑Wed Jun 29, 2022 6:39 pm

Even FOX says so.

But FOX is getting kinda RINO, I guess.

I am so sorry for your comprehension problems. My remarks were about her testimony about the steering wheel and lunging at an agent. I am done trying to make you understand that, it seems to be too hard. I have not said I didn’t believe he wasn’t furious or shouting. Was he? Only those PRESENT know. Hutchinson has been discredited in part of her testimony, do I believe her on everything? Nope. Some may be truthful but she was not there for everything.

Have a nice night.

All you've done is stay focused on the denial part. You have continuously ignored what the SECRET SERVICE has said.

I'm beginning to understand that term MAGAts. You too.