A community where moms are free to confess and share anything
https://momconfessions.net/
CockatooCrazyColt529 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 22, 2018 2:39 pmIs that what US Protestants called it when they made laws in the 19th and 20th centuries against Catholics?Billie.jeens wrote: ↑Wed Nov 21, 2018 12:14 pm "hate speech" is a nonexistent Construct that Fascists invented to limit thought -
It doesn't exist in the real world.
wtf?? 1st there are health benefits to male circumcision like reducing risk of certain STDs and penile cancer and sometimes is medically neccessary. 2nd, cutting off foreskin is not = to removing a clitoris and labia in the most minor case, sewing up the vaginal opening in the most extreme cases. FGM causes many health problems, the labia prevent infections and the clitoris is the main source of nerves for a woman. it is more equivalent to the tip if the penis as far as sexual nerve endings, although it has even more! I understand the argument against male circumcision but it is Not = to FGM. this should be a BIPARTISAN issue. its barbaric and has no place in western society.TheQueenOfEverything wrote: ↑Wed Nov 21, 2018 11:32 am There are forms of female circumcision that are very similar to - even less invasive than - male circumcision. Often just a small nick as part of a religious ritual. That is what is most likely to occur in the US. And circumcision of males outside the Jewish religion was popularized by a doctor who was trying to combat the “problem” of masturbation in young males.
FTR I’m not a fan of circumcision of infants of either gender. Just pointing out that they aren’t that different, and as such this ruling is legally sound.Lexy wrote: ↑Wed Nov 21, 2018 11:22 amFemale circumcision is to control the sexuality of the female. You are comparing apples and oranges.
Female genital mutilation is classified into four types:
Type I: Also known as clitoridectomy, this type consists of partial or total removal of the clitoris and/or its prepuce.
Type II: Also known as excision, the clitoris and labia minora are partially or totally removed, with or without excision of the labia majora.
Type III: The most severe form, it is also known as infibulation or pharaonic type. The procedure consists of narrowing the vaginal orifice with creation of a covering seal by cutting and appositioning the labia minora and/or labia majora, with or without removal of the clitoris. The appositioning of the wound edges consists of stitching or holding the cut areas together for a certain period of time (for example, girls’ legs are bound together), to create the covering seal. A small opening is left for urine and menstrual blood to escape. An infibulation must be opened either through penetrative sexual intercourse or surgery.
Type IV: This type consists of all other procedures to the genitalia of women for non-medical purposes, such as pricking, piercing, incising, scraping and cauterization.
http://www.endfgm.eu/female-genital-mut ... at-is-fgm/
water<wine wrote: ↑Thu Nov 22, 2018 4:30 pmwtf?? 1st there are health benefits to male circumcision like reducing risk of certain STDs and penile cancer and sometimes is medically neccessary. 2nd, cutting off foreskin is not = to removing a clitoris and labia in the most minor case, sewing up the vaginal opening in the most extreme cases. FGM causes many health problems, the labia prevent infections and the clitoris is the main source of nerves for a woman. it is more equivalent to the tip if the penis as far as sexual nerve endings, although it has even more! I understand the argument against male circumcision but it is Not = to FGM. this should be a BIPARTISAN issue. its barbaric and has no place in western society.TheQueenOfEverything wrote: ↑Wed Nov 21, 2018 11:32 am There are forms of female circumcision that are very similar to - even less invasive than - male circumcision. Often just a small nick as part of a religious ritual. That is what is most likely to occur in the US. And circumcision of males outside the Jewish religion was popularized by a doctor who was trying to combat the “problem” of masturbation in young males.
FTR I’m not a fan of circumcision of infants of either gender. Just pointing out that they aren’t that different, and as such this ruling is legally sound.Lexy wrote: ↑Wed Nov 21, 2018 11:22 am
Female circumcision is to control the sexuality of the female. You are comparing apples and oranges.
Female genital mutilation is classified into four types:
Type I: Also known as clitoridectomy, this type consists of partial or total removal of the clitoris and/or its prepuce.
Type II: Also known as excision, the clitoris and labia minora are partially or totally removed, with or without excision of the labia majora.
Type III: The most severe form, it is also known as infibulation or pharaonic type. The procedure consists of narrowing the vaginal orifice with creation of a covering seal by cutting and appositioning the labia minora and/or labia majora, with or without removal of the clitoris. The appositioning of the wound edges consists of stitching or holding the cut areas together for a certain period of time (for example, girls’ legs are bound together), to create the covering seal. A small opening is left for urine and menstrual blood to escape. An infibulation must be opened either through penetrative sexual intercourse or surgery.
Type IV: This type consists of all other procedures to the genitalia of women for non-medical purposes, such as pricking, piercing, incising, scraping and cauterization.
http://www.endfgm.eu/female-genital-mut ... at-is-fgm/
Oh FFS, you're not that naive to historical laws in the US, and if you are, you have just proven yourself to be not only a damn hypocrite, but also ignorant of religious laws in the States.Billie.jeens wrote: ↑Thu Nov 22, 2018 2:46 pm**** wrote: ↑Thu Nov 22, 2018 2:39 pmIs that what US Protestants called it when they made laws in the 19th and 20th centuries against Catholics?Billie.jeens wrote: ↑Wed Nov 21, 2018 12:14 pm "hate speech" is a nonexistent Construct that Fascists invented to limit thought -
It doesn't exist in the real world.
Example?
CockatooCrazyColt529 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 22, 2018 8:06 pmOh FFS, you're not that naive to historical laws in the US, and if you are, you have just proven yourself to be not only a damn hypocrite, but also ignorant of religious laws in the States.
Billie.jeens wrote: ↑Thu Nov 22, 2018 9:40 pmCockatooCrazyColt529 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 22, 2018 8:06 pmOh FFS, you're not that naive to historical laws in the US, and if you are, you have just proven yourself to be not only a damn hypocrite, but also ignorant of religious laws in the States.
So no examples
Why should she do any research because she's an expert on everything..........just ask her.Momto2boys973 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 23, 2018 11:49 am Since you obviously lack the capacity to do your own research, here, I did it for you:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/ ... -catholics
http://americanhistory.oxfordre.com/vie ... 9175-e-316
https://www.forbes.com/sites/trevorburr ... b816d627c2
Billie.jeens wrote: ↑Thu Nov 22, 2018 9:40 pmCockatooCrazyColt529 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 22, 2018 8:06 pm
Oh FFS, you're not that naive to historical laws in the US, and if you are, you have just proven yourself to be not only a damn hypocrite, but also ignorant of religious laws in the States.
So no examples