What are the chances
- Murdoc's Mistress
- Donated
-
Regent
- Posts: 2252
- Joined: Mon May 21, 2018 4:09 pm
- Location: Point Nemo
It will depend on his credit, his total income and debt to income ratio.
You were born an original, don't die a copy.
Just because it’s worth $30k does not mean he will get $30k. What don’t you understand about that??
SolidlyAverage wrote: ↑Tue Feb 12, 2019 8:54 amLol. You are either totally beyond help or just being intentionally irritating like a toddler.QuantumNursing wrote: ↑Mon Feb 11, 2019 11:33 pm
You are still thinking the trade in value is the same as the blue book value. Its not. Let me show you what I mean. We will use my Expedition as an example...
Please explain how, in your own explanation earlier, he would have $3k to use as a downpayment if she traded in a car worth $30k that she owed $27k.
You’re arguing against yourself at this point.
I perfectly understand that and have said as much quite plainly. That’s why it’s so funny that people keep making that point to me. It’s just deflection or intentional ignorance.
Maybe he gets $500 back. Maybe a miracle happens and he gets $6000! It makes no difference and isn’t at all relevant to the point of the post she replied to.
But since we are arguing semantics of someone saying “trade it in” instead of “sell it,” how do you know the OP didn’t mean that the trade in value was $30k?
Maybe he gets $500 back. Maybe a miracle happens and he gets $6000! It makes no difference and isn’t at all relevant to the point of the post she replied to.
But since we are arguing semantics of someone saying “trade it in” instead of “sell it,” how do you know the OP didn’t mean that the trade in value was $30k?
Anonymous 4 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 12, 2019 9:32 am Just because it’s worth $30k does not mean he will get $30k. What don’t you understand about that??
SolidlyAverage wrote: ↑Tue Feb 12, 2019 8:54 amLol. You are either totally beyond help or just being intentionally irritating like a toddler.QuantumNursing wrote: ↑Mon Feb 11, 2019 11:33 pm
You are still thinking the trade in value is the same as the blue book value. Its not. Let me show you what I mean. We will use my Expedition as an example...
Please explain how, in your own explanation earlier, he would have $3k to use as a downpayment if she traded in a car worth $30k that she owed $27k.
You’re arguing against yourself at this point.
- Fullxbusymom
- Princess Royal
- Posts: 5931
- Joined: Mon May 21, 2018 11:29 am
No, no you should not. It doesn't cost you anything extra. Part of your taxes already go towards assistance and that hasn't changed nor will it ever.RedBottoms wrote: ↑Mon Feb 11, 2019 6:12 pmIf they end up on assistance or default on loans we should get a say as responsible tax payers and responsible bill payers. It costs the rest of us higher prices to pay for the ones that get into debt they can't pay offFullxbusymom wrote: ↑Mon Feb 11, 2019 5:32 pmAnd glad you don't get a say.RedBottoms wrote: ↑Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:40 pm
and the last thing you need is a new car or a new kid when you cannot even pay off your other debts.
- Fullxbusymom
- Princess Royal
- Posts: 5931
- Joined: Mon May 21, 2018 11:29 am
A 3 row mini van is pretty inexpensive and $3,000 will buy a decent one. No, $3,000 won't necessarily buy a piece of crap. Or even if he got a small loan for $3,000 so now he is in a $6,000 vehicle that could be paid off within the year and a much lower payment every month, lower insurance, lower registration. Lower everything across the board.SolidlyAverage wrote: ↑Mon Feb 11, 2019 7:11 pmBuying a car (guessing a van or 3-row SUV, both expensive) for under $3k is an extremely stupid move. It will be a piece of crap. And when that junker breaks down two days later and they don’t have any cash for repairs or credit cards for emergencies, he’ll be out of a job, too.Fullxbusymom wrote: ↑Mon Feb 11, 2019 5:30 pmTo get out of his loan and buy a car outright from the extra he will get back because his car is worth more than he owes? How the f**k is that stupid?
- Fullxbusymom
- Princess Royal
- Posts: 5931
- Joined: Mon May 21, 2018 11:29 am
It does if he sells it and pays it off.QuantumNursing wrote: ↑Mon Feb 11, 2019 7:28 pmYpu realize the original car loan just wont disappear,right?Fullxbusymom wrote: ↑Mon Feb 11, 2019 5:30 pmTo get out of his loan and buy a car outright from the extra he will get back because his car is worth more than he owes? How the f**k is that stupid?
Vans aren’t really that cheap and the reliable makes hold their value pretty well. Any vehicle that’s only $3k is going to have very high mileage, so it has a long, unknown history, tons of wear on the engine, and no warranty.Fullxbusymom wrote: ↑Tue Feb 12, 2019 12:10 pmA 3 row mini van is pretty inexpensive and $3,000 will buy a decent one. No, $3,000 won't necessarily buy a piece of crap. Or even if he got a small loan for $3,000 so now he is in a $6,000 vehicle that could be paid off within the year and a much lower payment every month, lower insurance, lower registration. Lower everything across the board.SolidlyAverage wrote: ↑Mon Feb 11, 2019 7:11 pmBuying a car (guessing a van or 3-row SUV, both expensive) for under $3k is an extremely stupid move. It will be a piece of crap. And when that junker breaks down two days later and they don’t have any cash for repairs or credit cards for emergencies, he’ll be out of a job, too.Fullxbusymom wrote: ↑Mon Feb 11, 2019 5:30 pm
To get out of his loan and buy a car outright from the extra he will get back because his car is worth more than he owes? How the f**k is that stupid?
“Reliable” is subjective, of course, but I would never find a $3k vehicle reliable, personally. No one would be surprised if a car that only cost a few thousand dollars broke down within a year. And the lack of warranty would be a big concern if you have absolutely nothing available for emergencies.
My van cost 40,000. Lol it was brand new but yeah Vans are not cheap.SolidlyAverage wrote: ↑Tue Feb 12, 2019 1:31 pmVans aren’t really that cheap and the reliable makes hold their value pretty well. Any vehicle that’s only $3k is going to have very high mileage, so it has a long, unknown history, tons of wear on the engine, and no warranty.Fullxbusymom wrote: ↑Tue Feb 12, 2019 12:10 pmA 3 row mini van is pretty inexpensive and $3,000 will buy a decent one. No, $3,000 won't necessarily buy a piece of crap. Or even if he got a small loan for $3,000 so now he is in a $6,000 vehicle that could be paid off within the year and a much lower payment every month, lower insurance, lower registration. Lower everything across the board.SolidlyAverage wrote: ↑Mon Feb 11, 2019 7:11 pm
Buying a car (guessing a van or 3-row SUV, both expensive) for under $3k is an extremely stupid move. It will be a piece of crap. And when that junker breaks down two days later and they don’t have any cash for repairs or credit cards for emergencies, he’ll be out of a job, too.
“Reliable” is subjective, of course, but I would never find a $3k vehicle reliable, personally. No one would be surprised if a car that only cost a few thousand dollars broke down within a year. And the lack of warranty would be a big concern if you have absolutely nothing available for emergencies.
We just bought an Odyssey. Not the base model, granted, but yeah, not cheap!RedBottoms wrote: ↑Tue Feb 12, 2019 2:03 pmMy van cost 40,000. Lol it was brand new but yeah Vans are not cheap.SolidlyAverage wrote: ↑Tue Feb 12, 2019 1:31 pmVans aren’t really that cheap and the reliable makes hold their value pretty well. Any vehicle that’s only $3k is going to have very high mileage, so it has a long, unknown history, tons of wear on the engine, and no warranty.Fullxbusymom wrote: ↑Tue Feb 12, 2019 12:10 pm
A 3 row mini van is pretty inexpensive and $3,000 will buy a decent one. No, $3,000 won't necessarily buy a piece of crap. Or even if he got a small loan for $3,000 so now he is in a $6,000 vehicle that could be paid off within the year and a much lower payment every month, lower insurance, lower registration. Lower everything across the board.
“Reliable” is subjective, of course, but I would never find a $3k vehicle reliable, personally. No one would be surprised if a car that only cost a few thousand dollars broke down within a year. And the lack of warranty would be a big concern if you have absolutely nothing available for emergencies.
That's what we have. I bought the second cheapest model and it was still a fortune! At least to us. It's the nicest thing I own.SolidlyAverage wrote: ↑Tue Feb 12, 2019 3:48 pmWe just bought an Odyssey. Not the base model, granted, but yeah, not cheap!RedBottoms wrote: ↑Tue Feb 12, 2019 2:03 pmMy van cost 40,000. Lol it was brand new but yeah Vans are not cheap.SolidlyAverage wrote: ↑Tue Feb 12, 2019 1:31 pm
Vans aren’t really that cheap and the reliable makes hold their value pretty well. Any vehicle that’s only $3k is going to have very high mileage, so it has a long, unknown history, tons of wear on the engine, and no warranty.
“Reliable” is subjective, of course, but I would never find a $3k vehicle reliable, personally. No one would be surprised if a car that only cost a few thousand dollars broke down within a year. And the lack of warranty would be a big concern if you have absolutely nothing available for emergencies.