Mom Confessions

moviestar wrote: ↑Wed Dec 04, 2019 3:22 pm I find it so interesting how conservatives are so eager to make insinuations about Bill Clinton related to his association with Epstein, despite the lack of any actual accusation against him, or any history of a preoccupation with underage girls. Meanwhile, trump himself is also known to have been close friends with Epstein and a regular within his social circle, publicly makes suggestive comments about very young girls on a not-infrequent basis, and has been directly accused by a young woman of sexually assaulting her in when she was in her young teens - with corroboration by another woman known to have helped procure victims for Epstein and his associates - yet the right ignores it, dismisses her out of hand, or threatens her to the point that she went into hiding.

So... what's up with that?

morgan wrote: ↑Wed Dec 04, 2019 3:27 pm

AnnieArk wrote: ↑Wed Dec 04, 2019 3:24 pm

morgan wrote: ↑Wed Dec 04, 2019 3:14 pm

I still can't believe the clinton base is ignoring this.



In August, DailyMail.com revealed Epstein had a bizarre portrait of Bill in a dress hanging on the wall of his New York mansion. The picture depicted the former president apparently lounging on a chair in the Oval Office, wearing red heels and posing suggestively in a blue dress and was in a room off the stairway of Epstein's NYC townhouse, estimated to be worth $56 million

Well, the Trump base is ignoring Trump's connection to Epstein.

OMG! A Democrat did something! I don't know what to say....uh.....er.......omfg.......... QUICK! Deflect to Trump!

moviestar wrote: ↑Wed Dec 04, 2019 3:22 pm I find it so interesting how conservatives are so eager to make insinuations about Bill Clinton related to his association with Epstein, despite the lack of any actual accusation against him, or any history of a preoccupation with underage girls. Meanwhile, trump himself is also known to have been close friends with Epstein and a regular within his social circle, publicly makes suggestive comments about very young girls on a not-infrequent basis, and has been directly accused by a young woman of sexually assaulting her in when she was in her young teens - with corroboration by another woman known to have helped procure victims for Epstein and his associates - yet the right ignores it, dismisses her out of hand, or threatens her to the point that she went into hiding.

So... what's up with that?

KnotaDinghy wrote: ↑Thu Dec 05, 2019 10:50 am

moviestar wrote: ↑Wed Dec 04, 2019 3:22 pm I find it so interesting how conservatives are so eager to make insinuations about Bill Clinton related to his association with Epstein, despite the lack of any actual accusation against him, or any history of a preoccupation with underage girls. Meanwhile, trump himself is also known to have been close friends with Epstein and a regular within his social circle, publicly makes suggestive comments about very young girls on a not-infrequent basis, and has been directly accused by a young woman of sexually assaulting her in when she was in her young teens - with corroboration by another woman known to have helped procure victims for Epstein and his associates - yet the right ignores it, dismisses her out of hand, or threatens her to the point that she went into hiding.

So... what's up with that?

I personally think anyone in Epstein ‘s circle needs to be fully investigated and ALL co-conspirators held accountable for whatever their participation was.

I do see a difference between Trump’s association and Clinton’s. If you cannot, you are purely spewing partisan bullshit.

Trump was chummy. When his employee was accosted by Epstein, not only did Trump disassociate with him (like 15 years ago?) but also went to the court system and had Epstein banned from Trump’s property.

Clinton has been chummy it seems forever. He’s lied about the number of flights he went on with Epstein. As soon as Epstein was most recently arrested, Clinton was the first to immediately issue a press release vowing he didn’t know what Epstein has been up to. That type of quick public response makes it questionable in my mind. Reminds me of when Clinton ran to the cameras before to declare “I did not have sexual relations with that girl”.... oh but wait, he did and that public proclamation was a lie.

But both men have had various allegations tossed at them. So they should both be investigated. I simply can see a difference between the two.

moviestar wrote: ↑Wed Dec 04, 2019 3:22 pm I find it so interesting how conservatives are so eager to make insinuations about Bill Clinton related to his association with Epstein, despite the lack of any actual accusation against him, or any history of a preoccupation with underage girls. Meanwhile, trump himself is also known to have been close friends with Epstein and a regular within his social circle, publicly makes suggestive comments about very young girls on a not-infrequent basis, and has been directly accused by a young woman of sexually assaulting her in when she was in her young teens - with corroboration by another woman known to have helped procure victims for Epstein and his associates - yet the right ignores it, dismisses her out of hand, or threatens her to the point that she went into hiding.

So... what's up with that?

KnotaDinghy wrote: ↑Thu Dec 05, 2019 10:50 am

moviestar wrote: ↑Wed Dec 04, 2019 3:22 pm I find it so interesting how conservatives are so eager to make insinuations about Bill Clinton related to his association with Epstein, despite the lack of any actual accusation against him, or any history of a preoccupation with underage girls. Meanwhile, trump himself is also known to have been close friends with Epstein and a regular within his social circle, publicly makes suggestive comments about very young girls on a not-infrequent basis, and has been directly accused by a young woman of sexually assaulting her in when she was in her young teens - with corroboration by another woman known to have helped procure victims for Epstein and his associates - yet the right ignores it, dismisses her out of hand, or threatens her to the point that she went into hiding.

So... what's up with that?

I personally think anyone in Epstein ‘s circle needs to be fully investigated and ALL co-conspirators held accountable for whatever their participation was.

I do see a difference between Trump’s association and Clinton’s. If you cannot, you are purely spewing partisan bullshit.

Trump was chummy. When his employee was accosted by Epstein, not only did Trump disassociate with him (like 15 years ago?) but also went to the court system and had Epstein banned from Trump’s property.

Clinton has been chummy it seems forever. He’s lied about the number of flights he went on with Epstein. As soon as Epstein was most recently arrested, Clinton was the first to immediately issue a press release vowing he didn’t know what Epstein has been up to. That type of quick public response makes it questionable in my mind. Reminds me of when Clinton ran to the cameras before to declare “I did not have sexual relations with that girl”.... oh but wait, he did and that public proclamation was a lie.

But both men have had various allegations tossed at them. So they should both be investigated. I simply can see a difference between the two.