Supreme Court rules Trump cannot be kicked off Colorado primary ballot
Forum rules
Keep News and Politics about News and Politics.
Do not post full articles from other websites. Always link back to the source
Discuss things respectfully and take into account that each person has a different opinion.
Remember that this is a place for everyone to enjoy. Don’t try and run people off of the site. If you are upset with someone then utilize the foe feature.
Report when things come up.
Personal attacks are against guidelines however attacks need to be directed at a member on the forum for it to be against guidelines. Lying is not against guidelines, it’s hard for us to prove someone even did lie.
Once a topic is locked we consider the issue handled and no longer respond to new reports on the topic.
Keep News and Politics about News and Politics.
Do not post full articles from other websites. Always link back to the source
Discuss things respectfully and take into account that each person has a different opinion.
Remember that this is a place for everyone to enjoy. Don’t try and run people off of the site. If you are upset with someone then utilize the foe feature.
Report when things come up.
Personal attacks are against guidelines however attacks need to be directed at a member on the forum for it to be against guidelines. Lying is not against guidelines, it’s hard for us to prove someone even did lie.
Once a topic is locked we consider the issue handled and no longer respond to new reports on the topic.
-
- Marchioness
- Posts: 506
- Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2023 12:49 pm
Well, Colorado tried.
just an old coot
-
- Duchess
- Posts: 1857
- Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2023 8:30 am
It’s a much more fair election this way.
-
- Duchess
- Posts: 1857
- Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2023 8:30 am
It was a unanimous decision.
“We conclude that States may disqualify persons holding or attempting to hold state office. But States have no power under the Constitution to enforce Section 3 with respect to federal offices, especially the Presidency,” the Court ruled.
“We conclude that States may disqualify persons holding or attempting to hold state office. But States have no power under the Constitution to enforce Section 3 with respect to federal offices, especially the Presidency,” the Court ruled.
-
- Princess
- Posts: 22886
- Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2018 12:46 pm
It had to be a unanimous decision. Would you want to worry about J6 types raiding your work place or home?Slimshandy wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2024 12:53 pm It was a unanimous decision.
“We conclude that States may disqualify persons holding or attempting to hold state office. But States have no power under the Constitution to enforce Section 3 with respect to federal offices, especially the Presidency,” the Court ruled.
306/232
But I'm still the winner! They lied! They cheated! They stole the election!
But I'm still the winner! They lied! They cheated! They stole the election!
-
- Duchess
- Posts: 1857
- Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2023 8:30 am
This is kind of an intricate quote to respond to…Della wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2024 1:30 pmIt had to be a unanimous decision. Would you want to worry about J6 types raiding your work place or home?Slimshandy wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2024 12:53 pm It was a unanimous decision.
“We conclude that States may disqualify persons holding or attempting to hold state office. But States have no power under the Constitution to enforce Section 3 with respect to federal offices, especially the Presidency,” the Court ruled.
On one hand, they seem scary, right? Scary right wingers with sticks and guns…possibly emotionally forcing the Supreme Court to rule in favor of allowing voters to chose their own candidate.
On the other hand, that was probably their goal.
-
- Princess
- Posts: 22886
- Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2018 12:46 pm
"The Supreme Court said Monday it was avoiding “chaos” by squashing state-level efforts to throw Donald Trump off the ballot."Slimshandy wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2024 1:33 pmThis is kind of an intricate quote to respond to…Della wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2024 1:30 pmIt had to be a unanimous decision. Would you want to worry about J6 types raiding your work place or home?Slimshandy wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2024 12:53 pm It was a unanimous decision.
“We conclude that States may disqualify persons holding or attempting to hold state office. But States have no power under the Constitution to enforce Section 3 with respect to federal offices, especially the Presidency,” the Court ruled.
On one hand, they seem scary, right? Scary right wingers with sticks and guns…possibly emotionally forcing the Supreme Court to rule in favor of allowing voters to chose their own candidate.
On the other hand, that was probably their goal.
https://www.politico.com/news/2024/03/0 ... s-00144834
306/232
But I'm still the winner! They lied! They cheated! They stole the election!
But I'm still the winner! They lied! They cheated! They stole the election!
- MonarchMom
- Princess Royal
- Posts: 5826
- Joined: Sat May 26, 2018 8:52 pm
Della wrote: ↑Tue Mar 05, 2024 6:49 am"The Supreme Court said Monday it was avoiding “chaos” by squashing state-level efforts to throw Donald Trump off the ballot."Slimshandy wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2024 1:33 pmThis is kind of an intricate quote to respond to…
On one hand, they seem scary, right? Scary right wingers with sticks and guns…possibly emotionally forcing the Supreme Court to rule in favor of allowing voters to chose their own candidate.
On the other hand, that was probably their goal.
Now if only there were a way of "avoiding chaos" that will result from him being on the ballot.
-
- Duchess
- Posts: 1857
- Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2023 8:30 am
Exactly,Della wrote: ↑Tue Mar 05, 2024 6:49 am"The Supreme Court said Monday it was avoiding “chaos” by squashing state-level efforts to throw Donald Trump off the ballot."Slimshandy wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2024 1:33 pmThis is kind of an intricate quote to respond to…
On one hand, they seem scary, right? Scary right wingers with sticks and guns…possibly emotionally forcing the Supreme Court to rule in favor of allowing voters to chose their own candidate.
On the other hand, that was probably their goal.
https://www.politico.com/news/2024/03/0 ... s-00144834
If they made this decision to avoid chaos, then that chaos would be directly correlated to the freedoms and liberties conservatives view their American rights to be.
If there was a goal to attempt to “rise up” against the government to force them into securing their electoral freedom… they’re going to feel like they won.
When they keep bringing up the founding fathers, this is partly why… because they were the ones that fought back and secured their own freedoms. They like comparing today to back then, and they like thinking they’re acting like the founding fathers would have…