It’s kinda like any other social media platform where anything goes and it’s a rush to go viral. No, it’s not all nudes..it has all sorts of content.Pjmm wrote: ↑Wed Feb 08, 2023 11:16 amIdk I hear echoes of Harper valley PTA here (a movie and song where the PTA complained about a single mothers lifestyle). Unless the mother is selling her onlyfans to teenagers she can do whatever she pleases. Now if the aforementioned teenagers can access her site I can see the school being upset. Idk enough about only fans honestly. If this is an elementary school and a parents kid can access only fans they’ve got bigger problems than this woman. It also depends what’s on her only fans. According to my son there is nudity but not always. I guess we’ll see what the courts decide.SouthernIslander wrote: ↑Sun Feb 05, 2023 1:14 pm Sometimes I feel like a broken record but actions have consequences. I am all for enjoying your youth but if you have full blown adult content on public display, there may be some opportunities you’re not a good fit for and life isn’t about seeing how far you can push the envelope.
I don’t have access to details of the case, so this sounds like something the courts need to sort through and determine what is fair but these petty stories have gotten so draining.
I will say not allowing her to volunteer is one thing. Not allowing her ever on school grounds is another. Idc if she’s stripping at the local gentleman’s club. That’s hypocrisy.
I totally agree, it depends on the situation. Idk which site it was but there was a lady who went viral for giving her boyfriend head until she vomited. I understand that not being a good time for the couple to greet visitors at the school bake sale but that’s not what this was.
I strongly disagree from banning anyone from the property without criminal reason but denying a parent’s access to their child is blood boiling. They are lucky all she is handing this the right way by suing.