Should Biden have had any documents? No.
Should Trump have had any documents? No
It is well understood that on occasion some documents may not be returned due to human error during transitions and that they may get mixed in with other paperwork. That's
what we call oversight. It happens. It shouldn't but it does. That's why there are aides to try to make sure it doesn't happen and all files get returned to the appropriate departments. However mistakes are occasionally made. Aides are only human after all.
Thus it is how the discovery and RETURN of the documents is handled that is the issue.
Trump was treated "differently" because he KNOWINGLY took the documents, he was asked to return the documents by the National Archives and he refused which led to an FBI raid to retrieve them.
Biden did not know he had the documents (neither did the National Archives), he contacted the proper authorities and turned the documents in right away and conducted additional checks for any other missing documents and turned them in as well.
Biden followed the rules and protocols laid out in the event of an oversight......Trump did not.
And yes I would expect the DOJ to assign a special counsel in ANY case where classified documents are discovered in order to determine how the documents arrived at that location, who had access to them, and whether anything in those documents could be considered a threat to national security etc.. That is their JOB. It doesn't matter if it was in the hallway outside the oval office from an aide dropping a load of files....the documents weren't where they were supposed to be, it's the DOJ's job to find out the who, how, when. why, and what. (who had access, how did it get there, when was it there, why was it there, and what was in the documents?)
The only "Shenanigans" is in trying to claim that these events are in any way similar or in an attempt to use it as a "Gotcha" because "Biden had documents too"
BobCobbMagob wrote: ↑Sat Jan 14, 2023 10:47 am Lol Yes yes… you reword news reports well.
Go a bit further than that now… and realize I’m calling shenanigans on that narrative.
That’s where we are in the conversation…Baconqueen13 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 14, 2023 10:18 amLet me dumb it down for you again....BobCobbMagob wrote: ↑Fri Jan 13, 2023 7:56 am
Lmao... Unsure of your position here?
You tend to get quite vulgar whenever you want to gloss over the meat of the thread...
But yeah... It doesn't matter which laws they broke, it only matters how they act once their crimes are found out...
National archives did not know of Biden documents. They were found and turned over IMMEDIATELY upon discovery. NA said "hey do us a favor and conduct a review and search for any additional documents" and Biden said "we'll get right on that" and turned over IMMEDIATELY any additional documents found......total documents are less than 20 classified from all locations, NONE marked secret or top secret,
This would be like going shopping for groceries and as you load up your car you find a package of taco seasoning you forgot to scan so you return immediately to pay for it.
National archives knew records were missing with Trump and asked they be turned over. Trump said "No they're mine I declassified tem with my magical pea brain" and stalled. He also had over 11000 classified documents. Including top secret and secret documents.
This is like going in to go shopping, filling 2 carts full and just walking out and not paying for them and then claiming you're allowed because you know the manager.
If you don't understand the difference between these scenarios it's because you are either willfully ignorant or have an IQ of 12.