Not every special needs person is violent or dangerous. And there is no way this boy went from zero to “throwing random children off 30 foot structures” out of nowhere. I’d bet my last dollar hat he has shown violent and impulsive behavior before. I don’t think hiring an aide wasn’t enough - though I wouldn’t argue with growing some charges at her too, even though I doubt the parents warned her about exactly how dangerous their kid is.
RedBottoms wrote: ↑Sun Aug 05, 2018 7:52 amthe Parents hired an aide to take him out into public and monitor and control him. The aide did not do their job.TheQueenOfEverything wrote: ↑Sat Aug 04, 2018 10:49 pm And frankly it wouldn’t hurt my feelings any if he was the victim of a similarly “minor” assault in prison. I literally saw red when I first read the details of this. That poor little boy. I also feel like the parents should be charged with negligence for letting this monster out in public.cellomom26 wrote: ↑Sat Aug 04, 2018 10:41 pm
Agreed.
He clearly is a danger to the public. He needs to be locked up for everyone's safety.
The charge of 3rd degree assault is laughable.
This is a slippery slope here people. Are you suggesting we go back to the days of locking all people less than 100% perfect and typical away in institutions or our attics like they did in the 20s?
If he was dangerous the water park may not have been the best place for him-but we can't also go back to the way things were where we lock people away either. Or do you want to do what Hitler did and have them sent to the gas chambers for being special needs?