I went undercover to expose the US, Australia gun lobby

Forum rules
Keep News and Politics about News and Politics.

Do not post full articles from other websites. Always link back to the source

Discuss things respectfully and take into account that each person has a different opinion.

Remember that this is a place for everyone to enjoy. Don’t try and run people off of the site. If you are upset with someone then utilize the foe feature.

Report when things come up.

Personal attacks are against guidelines however attacks need to be directed at a member on the forum for it to be against guidelines. Lying is not against guidelines, it’s hard for us to prove someone even did lie.

Once a topic is locked we consider the issue handled and no longer respond to new reports on the topic.
Locked Previous topicNext topic
Deleted User 276

Unread post

Charley then got to the point. His idea was to create a pro-gun group in Australia that would, in theory, appeal to the NRA. He asked if I would be interested in posing as that group's founder and president in order to infiltrate the NRA? And, if so, would I be comfortable wearing hidden cameras on frequent visits to the US to cultivate ties with the NRA, and to record my conversations with them?
https://www.aljazeera.com/blogs/america ... 18734.html
Top
Pjmm
Donated
Donated
Princess
Princess
Posts: 18990
Joined: Mon May 21, 2018 6:31 am

Unread post

I'm confused. Did this article end abruptly without being finished or am I missing something?
Top
User avatar
jas
Donated
Donated
Princess Royal
Princess Royal
Posts: 8102
Joined: Fri May 25, 2018 8:33 am
Location: This space for rent

Unread post

Pjmm wrote: ↑Mon Mar 25, 2019 9:01 pm I'm confused. Did this article end abruptly without being finished or am I missing something?
He was exposed and is now being held hostage...

Seriously, I thought it ended pretty abruptly as well. Like there's a part 2 out there somewhere.
Top
Deleted User 276

Unread post

Pjmm wrote: ↑Mon Mar 25, 2019 9:01 pm I'm confused. Did this article end abruptly without being finished or am I missing something?
The video in the link is 48 minutes long. The article was a tease.
Top
Pjmm
Donated
Donated
Princess
Princess
Posts: 18990
Joined: Mon May 21, 2018 6:31 am

Unread post

msb64 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 25, 2019 9:29 pm
Pjmm wrote: ↑Mon Mar 25, 2019 9:01 pm I'm confused. Did this article end abruptly without being finished or am I missing something?
The video in the link is 48 minutes long. The article was a tease.
I really don't like videos. Idk why but I find reading over sitting through some video easier.
Top
Locked Previous topicNext topic

Return to “News & Politics”