There's not enough information to make that call. She and the baby may have been "healthy" when released and then became ill after the journey and 7 days in detention. What's also not known is where in Mexico she had the baby. Some parts of rural Mexico are not equipped to handle difficult births and neonatal care.Mommabearof2 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 16, 2019 6:25 pmWalk you through that...what the hell does that even mean? She most likely gave birth in a hospital to a premature baby. Unless they kicked her out, she should have stayed until both herself and the baby were healthy.TheReluctantHippie wrote: ↑Sun Jun 16, 2019 3:25 pm Actually, yes, parts of Mexico are plagued with a lot of problems similar to those migrant refugees are hoping to escape.
I don’t know what her options are in the US or why this was her destination. Which is why I’m not out here saying what she should have done differently. But you are, so I assume you know something I don’t. You say she should have stayed in Mexico “for a week or two.” Walk me through that, would you?Mommabearof2 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 16, 2019 11:16 am
What are her options in America? Why are they any different? Shouldn't she be just as safe in Mexico as she is here? Or is Mexico really a bad country too?
I'm part of a group who meets the Greyhound route carrying asylum seekers north. Friday we had a young woman with a 5 day old baby. Both were in good shape but were released from ICE with no diapers, food, blanket, money, or change of clothes. They were on hour 36 of a 58+ hour journey. Without the help of people in groups like ours which gives food, and supplies to asylum seekers, this mother and baby could also have been in distress by the time they reached their destination.