DT tells court he cannot post bond

Forum rules
Keep News and Politics about News and Politics.

Do not post full articles from other websites. Always link back to the source

Discuss things respectfully and take into account that each person has a different opinion.

Remember that this is a place for everyone to enjoy. Don’t try and run people off of the site. If you are upset with someone then utilize the foe feature.

Report when things come up.

Personal attacks are against guidelines however attacks need to be directed at a member on the forum for it to be against guidelines. Lying is not against guidelines, it’s hard for us to prove someone even did lie.

Once a topic is locked we consider the issue handled and no longer respond to new reports on the topic.
Slimshandy
Duchess
Duchess
Posts: 1377
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2023 8:30 am

Unread post

Della wrote: Mon Mar 25, 2024 8:22 pm
Slimshandy wrote: Mon Mar 25, 2024 7:33 pm
Della wrote: Mon Mar 25, 2024 5:55 pm

In layman's terms, explain what it means?
The Court has held the clause inapplicable to civil jury awards of punitive damages in cases between private parties, when the government neither has prosecuted the action nor has any right to receive a share of the damages awarded.4 The Court based this conclusion on a review of the history and purposes of the Excessive Fines Clause. At the time the Eighth Amendment was adopted, the Court noted, the word ‘fine’ was understood to mean a payment to a sovereign as punishment for some offense.







It means that normally in civil trials this doesn’t apply, but in cases where the state/fed would be monetary recipients, it does.
What about the bolded?
Right… what do you think that means?
Post Reply Previous topicNext topic